From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Kelly

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois
Apr 30, 2007
06-1232 (C.D. Ill. Apr. 30, 2007)

Opinion

06-1232.

April 30, 2007


ORDER


This cause is before the court on plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [d/e 12].

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court is required to determine if the plaintiff's appeal is taken in good faith. "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915(a)(3) is not about the plaintiff's sincerity in requesting appellate review. Rather, an appeal taken in "good faith" is an appeal that, objectively considered, raises non-frivolous colorable issues. See Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59, 62 (1971); see also Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).

On February 20, 2007, this court indicated that it doubted whether plaintiff's appeal was taken in good faith, and directed the plaintiff to submit a brief stating his grounds for appeal to assist the court in determining the issue. see Celske v. Edwards, 164 F.3d 396, 398 (7th Cir. 1999). The plaintiff was directed to file his brief on or before March 6, 2007. More than a month has passed since the deadline and the plaintiff has not responded.

On November 13, 2006, the court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint on merit review for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Since the court has not been able to find any substantial issue meriting relief from judgement, and the plaintiff has failed to proffer any reason for the court to doubt this determination, the court cannot find a good faith basis for appeal. Accordingly, the court denies plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that the appeal is not in good faith.

The Seventh Circuit has determined that if the district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, the appellant cannot prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis, but must pay the appellate fees of $455 within 14 days. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). If the plaintiff wishes to contest this court's finding that the appeal is not taken in good faith, he must file a motion with the Court of Appeals seeking review of this court's certification within 30 days after service of this order. See Fed.R.App.P. 24(a).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. [d/e 12]. Plaintiff is ordered to remit to the Clerk of the Court the $455 appellate fee within 14 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is responsible for ensuring payment of the filing fees as directed by this order, and should ensure that the institution having custody of him transmits the necessary funds. The obligation to ensure full payment of the filing fees imposed by this order shall not be relieved by release or transfer to another prison. Plaintiff is under a continuing obligation to inform the Clerk of this Court in writing of any change of address within seven days.The clerk is directed to submit a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit


Summaries of

Meyer v. Kelly

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois
Apr 30, 2007
06-1232 (C.D. Ill. Apr. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Meyer v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:MARK MEYER, Plaintiff, v. RENEE KELLY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois

Date published: Apr 30, 2007

Citations

06-1232 (C.D. Ill. Apr. 30, 2007)