From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Ford Motor Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1967
27 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

April 10, 1967


On the court's own motion, the last paragraph of this court's decision [ 27 A.D.2d 851] dated March 20, 1967 is amended to read as follows: "As to defendant Kuzmack, were the judgment in his favor, we would reverse it as to him and order a new trial on the authority of Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp. ( 17 N.Y.2d 132). Such, however, is not the case. The complaint was dismissed as to Kuzmack at the end of plaintiff's case and, although such dismissal is included in the preliminary recitals in the judgment, there are no decretal provisions in Kuzmack's favor in the judgment. Hence, with respect to Kuzmack, an appeal from the judgment does not properly lie." The order made on March 20, 1967 is amended accordingly. Ughetta, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Ford Motor Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1967
27 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Meyer v. Ford Motor Company

Case Details

Full title:HARRY MEYER, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Respondent. HARRY MEYER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Kushner v. Woodcliff

Although plaintiff defaulted on the motion to dismiss at Special Term, on the appeal she argues for the first…