From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. De C.V. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2016-1038 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1038 2016-1041

10-11-2016

MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING S.A. DE C.V., Appellant v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Cross-Appellant

JOSEPH A. KROMHOLZ, Ryan, Kromholz & Manion, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by PATRICK J. FLEIS. GREGG F. LOCASCIO, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM H. BURGESS, NOAH SAMUEL FRANK; JOSEPH J. BERGHAMMER, TIMOTHY J. RECHTIEN, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL; JOSEPH MICHAEL SKERPON, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00576.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH A. KROMHOLZ, Ryan, Kromholz & Manion, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by PATRICK J. FLEIS. GREGG F. LOCASCIO, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM H. BURGESS, NOAH SAMUEL FRANK; JOSEPH J. BERGHAMMER, TIMOTHY J. RECHTIEN, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL; JOSEPH MICHAEL SKERPON, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. De C.V. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2016-1038 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. De C.V. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING S.A. DE C.V., Appellant v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2016

Citations

2016-1038 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)