From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metz v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
May 11, 2011
No. 08-09-00294-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 08-09-00294-CV

May 11, 2011.

Appealed from County Court at Law No 5 of El Paso County, Texas, (TC # 2008-4055).

Before CHEW, C.J., McCLURE, and RIVERA, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On March 24, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and that no motion for extension of time had been received. The Clerk also informed the parties of the Court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. To this date, no one has responded to the Clerk's letter.

This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed and gives no reasonable explanation for the failure to do so. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Metz v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
May 11, 2011
No. 08-09-00294-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Metz v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:WILBUR G. METZ, Appellant, v. MAURICE W. SULLIVAN AND KATHRYN G. CROSBY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

No. 08-09-00294-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2011)