From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metz v. Milne

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Aug 16, 2022
Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-62-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-62-TFM-MU

08-16-2022

GEORGE D. METZ, II Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MILNE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 19, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which recommends the Defendants' Rule 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process be denied. See Doc. 20. No objections were filed.

Therefore, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (Doc. 12) is DENIED. Defendants shall file their answers pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(4)(A).

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2022.


Summaries of

Metz v. Milne

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Aug 16, 2022
Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-62-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Metz v. Milne

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. METZ, II Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MILNE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

Civ. Act. 1:22-cv-62-TFM-MU (S.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2022)