From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Trust Company v. Heinze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

January, 1910.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.


Without passing upon the sufficiency of the defense set up in the proposed answer, in view of the size of the judgment and the circumstances under which it was entered, and of the fact that under the amendment of the rule in relation to Trial Terms the plaintiff can move to have its case tried at Part 2 and thus obtain a speedy trial, the order appealed from should be modified by providing that the judgment shall stand as security, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.


Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Trust Company v. Heinze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Metropolitan Trust Company v. Heinze

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v . ARTHUR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1910

Citations

136 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)