From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1988
526 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-2512.

June 21, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Edward N. Moore, Judge.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Gary Siplin, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellant.

Friedman and Friedman, Miami Beach, Daniels and Hicks and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Concluding that the trial court's instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 21, 1988
526 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Metropolitan Dade County v. Marino

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT, v. ANA MARINO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 21, 1988

Citations

526 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Bengochea

Sun Supermarkets, Inc. v. Fields, 568 So.2d 480, 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (quoting Eastern Steamship Lines,…