Opinion
No. 2021-657 Q C
12-02-2022
Metro Medical Diagnostics, P.C., as Assignee of Miroslaw Bazan, Appellant, v. Country-Wide Insurance Company, Respondent.
Glinkenhouse Queen, Esqs. (Alan Queen of counsel), for appellant. Thomas Torto, for respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
Glinkenhouse Queen, Esqs. (Alan Queen of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas Torto, for respondent.
PRESENT:: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, CHEREÉ A. BUGGS, JJ
Appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered October 12, 2021. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $652.20 pursuant to a stipulation of settlement entered into in July 2010, awarded plaintiff statutory no-fault interest from February 14, 2017.
ORDERED that the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a new judgment in accordance with this decision and order.
This action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits was commenced in 2001 and settled in July 2010. Defendant did not pay the settlement amount, and a judgment was subsequently entered on January 31, 2017 pursuant to CPLR 5003-a, awarding plaintiff statutory no-fault interest from the date of the settlement at a simple rate. In February 2017, plaintiff moved, pursuant to CPLR 5019 (a), to, in effect, correct the January 31, 2017 judgment by recalculating the statutory no-fault interest from a simple rate to a compound rate. By order entered February 22, 2018, the Civil Court granted the motion, directed the clerk to recalculate the interest at a rate of 2% per month, compounded, but, sua sponte, tolled the accrual of statutory no-fault interest from July 26, 2010 through February 14, 2017. A judgment was entered on October 12, 2021, accordingly.
Plaintiff correctly argues that the Civil Court erred in tolling the statutory no-fault interest from the date of the settlement to the date of plaintiff's motion. Once the case settled, defendant was obligated to pay the agreed-upon amount to plaintiff (see CPLR 5003-a) and "plaintiff, as the prevailing party, was not required to make a demand for the money" (Seaside Rehabilitation v Allstate Ins. Co., 63 Misc.3d 162 [A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50918[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted; see CPLR 5003-a [e]). Defendant did not demonstrate that plaintiff had prevented defendant in any way from paying the settlement amount (see ERHAL Holding Corp. v Rusin, 252 A.D.2d 473 [1998]; Juracka v Ferrara, 120 A.D.2d 822 [1986]; Craniofacial Pain Mgt. v Allstate Ins. Co., 61 Misc.3d 155 [A], 2018 NY Slip Op 51825[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018]). Therefore, the Civil Court erred in tolling the accrual of interest (see Seaside Rehabilitation v Allstate Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50918[U]).
Accordingly, the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a new judgment in accordance with this decision and order.
ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and BUGGS, JJ., concur.