Opinion
No. 3:18-cv-00929-JR
05-09-2021
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on March 5, 2021, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and enter judgment dismissing this case. F&R, ECF 125. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 129. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [125]. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [103][106]. This case is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 9, 2021.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge