From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metcalf v. Kallis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2019
No. 18-7260 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7260

02-26-2019

BRADFORD METCALF, Petitioner - Appellant, v. S. KALLIS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Bradford Metcalf, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00121-GMG) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradford Metcalf, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bradford Metcalf, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metcalf v. S. Kallis, No. 3:17-cv-00121-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 3, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Metcalf v. Kallis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2019
No. 18-7260 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Metcalf v. Kallis

Case Details

Full title:BRADFORD METCALF, Petitioner - Appellant, v. S. KALLIS, Warden, Respondent…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7260 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)