From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mester v. Reed

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-3307 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3307 FCD KJN P.

January 26, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On December 22, 2010, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should not be stayed for three months based on plaintiff's alleged inability to write due to a wrist injury. On January 19, 2011, defendants filed a response. Defendants are not opposed to the proposed three-month stay, but note that Dr. Swingle's declaration states there have been discrepancies between the symptoms plaintiff reports and the results of diagnostic tests. (Dkt. No. 59 at 2, citing Case No. 2:10-cv-2105 LKK EFB P (Dkt. No. 25 at ¶¶ 5, 7, 10, 12 20). Defendants request plaintiff be required to file a status report at the end of the three month period, and that defendants be permitted to object to further requests for stay should medical reports indicate plaintiff is capable of proceeding.

A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986).

As plaintiff was previously informed, this court is unable to stay this action for an indefinite period of time. While the court is sympathetic to plaintiff's medical issues, it is incumbent upon plaintiff to prosecute this action. The court will grant plaintiff a three month stay from the date of the filing of his notice. Plaintiff will be required, by a date certain, to file a status report indicating the status of his wrist injury, and whether he is able to proceed. Defendants will be afforded an opportunity to respond to plaintiff's status report. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

Plaintiff may be able to obtain the assistance of another inmate or jailhouse lawyer. Moreover, to oppose the motion to dismiss based on an alleged failure to exhaust his administrative grievances, plaintiff may submit documents demonstrating he obtained a third level decision concerning his grievance against defendant Miller. This would require photocopying as opposed to handwriting.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is stayed. On or before March 11, 2011, plaintiff shall file a status report providing the status of his injury, and stating whether he is able to proceed. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed fourteen days thereafter. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively terminate this action.

DATED: January 25, 2011


Summaries of

Mester v. Reed

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-3307 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Mester v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS MESTER, Plaintiff, v. MILLER and REED, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3307 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2011)