From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Messina v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1991
169 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 17, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.).


Third-party defendant Duncanson moved for summary judgment dismissing the city's third-party complaint, since the city had failed to comply with a previous order directing the city to comply with Duncanson's discovery demands. The city asserted that its failure to comply was due to "administrative mistake". The IAS court denied the summary judgment motion and ordered the city to pay third-party defendant $500 as compensation for the services required in making the motion.

While the city's excuses for failing to comply with the demands for discovery appear to us to be questionable, there is no evidence that such failure was willful or contumacious, and thus, the motion for summary judgment was appropriately denied. (Laverne v Incorporated Vil. of Laurel Hollow, 18 N.Y.2d 635, appeal dismissed 386 U.S. 682.) Under the circumstances, since it appears that the city has not responded to Duncanson's demands for discovery and inspection, Duncanson's motion for summary judgment is granted unless the city complies with the demands within 60 days of this court's order.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Messina v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1991
169 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Messina v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MESSINA et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)