From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Messier v. Messier

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 12, 2013
NO. 14-13-00572-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00572-CV

2013-09-12

LUC J. MESSIER, Appellant v. KATY SHUK CHI LAU MESSIER, Appellee


Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed September 12, 2013

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-45158


ABATEMENT ORDER

After a non-jury trial, appellant brings this appeal from a judgment signed June 25, 2013. Appellant timely requested findings of fact and conclusions of law and timely reminded the trial court when the findings and conclusions were overdue. The trial court did not file the requested findings and conclusions. On August 29, 2013, appellant asked this court to order the trial court to find findings of fact and conclusions of law.

When an appellant timely files a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law and a timely notice of past due findings, the trial court's error in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law is generally presumed to be harmful, unless the record before the appellate court affirmatively shows that the complaining party has suffered no injury. See Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Magallanes, 763 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Tex. 1989); Electronic Power Design, Inc., v. R.A. Hanson Co., Inc., 821 S.W.2d 170, 171 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no writ).

Appellant avers in his motion that he cannot properly present or frame his issues without the findings and conclusions. In this case, therefore, we cannot say that the record affirmatively discloses no injury. Because the trial judge continues to serve on the district court, the error in this case is remediable. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4. The proper remedy is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to correct its error. See Zeiba v. Martin, 928 S.W.2d 782, 786 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ).

We ORDER the trial court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law on or before October 4, 2013. Within ten days after the trial court has filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, any party may file a request for specified additional or amended findings or conclusions. The trial court shall file any additional or amended findings that are appropriate within ten days after such a request is filed. The trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, and any additional and amended findings or conclusions, shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with this court on or before November 1, 2013.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court's active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court's active docket when the trial court's findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court's order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Messier v. Messier

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 12, 2013
NO. 14-13-00572-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Messier v. Messier

Case Details

Full title:LUC J. MESSIER, Appellant v. KATY SHUK CHI LAU MESSIER, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 12, 2013

Citations

NO. 14-13-00572-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2013)