From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Messer v. Monfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

December, 1934.


In an action for an accounting, order granting motion of the corporate defendants to dismiss the amended complaint because it is insufficient as to them on the face thereof affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ( Boag v. Thompson, 208 App. Div. 132; Koenigsberger v. Kahn, 228 id. 658.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Messer v. Monfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1934
243 App. Div. 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Messer v. Monfried

Case Details

Full title:PETER MESSER, Appellant, v. MAX MONFRIED, Defendant, and LONG ISLAND DEPOT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1934

Citations

243 App. Div. 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)