From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mesidor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 9, 1988
521 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

reversing the denial of a motion for postconviction relief based on the trial court's failure to swear in an interpreter

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. State

Opinion

No. 87-2138.

March 9, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Rupert Jasen Smith, J.

Lloyd M. Routman, of Lloyd M. Routman, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. During the plea proceedings, the trial court failed to comply with § 90.606, Florida Statutes (1985), by failing to swear in the interpreter. Also, the court failed to determine the competency and bias of the interpreter.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mesidor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 9, 1988
521 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

reversing the denial of a motion for postconviction relief based on the trial court's failure to swear in an interpreter

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. State

reversing denial of motion for postconviction relief based on trial court's failure to swear in an interpreter

Summary of this case from Fernandez v. State
Case details for

Mesidor v. State

Case Details

Full title:GHISLAINE MESIDOR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 9, 1988

Citations

521 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

See generally Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995). Defendants' reliance on Balderrama v. State, 433…

Obando v. State

Unlike other cases that have suggested some impropriety or bias in the interpreter or inaccuracy in the…