From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meshell v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 23, 2005
No. 3:03-CV-086-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2005)

Opinion

No. 3:03-CV-086-D.

August 23, 2005


ORDER


After conducting a de novo review, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Petitioner's motion to reopen the time for filing an appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner's appeal filed July 13, 2005, shall be considered timely filed.

Petitioner's motion is dated July 13, 2005, and was docketed July 18, 2005. See Spotville v. Cain, 149 F.3d 374, 377 (5th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (holding, under prison mailbox rule, pro se motions are filed when papers are delivered to prison authorities for mailing).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Meshell v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 23, 2005
No. 3:03-CV-086-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2005)
Case details for

Meshell v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LYNN MESHELL, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 23, 2005

Citations

No. 3:03-CV-086-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2005)