From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MERZ v. WOLFE

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
May 9, 2011
CASE NO: 8:11-cv-953-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. May. 9, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:11-cv-953-T-33EAJ.

May 9, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed his Complaint alleging diversity jurisdiction (Doc. # 1). The Complaint, however, alleges only "damages that exceed $15,000.00," which does not satisfy the amount in controversy necessary to establish subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by May 23, 2011. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing the case without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Beavers v. A.O. Smith Elec. Products Co., 265 Fed. App'x 772, 779 (11th Cir. 2008) (When a court discovers that it lacks jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3)). DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

MERZ v. WOLFE

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
May 9, 2011
CASE NO: 8:11-cv-953-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. May. 9, 2011)
Case details for

MERZ v. WOLFE

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD MERZ, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WOLFE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: May 9, 2011

Citations

CASE NO: 8:11-cv-953-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. May. 9, 2011)