Opinion
January, 1918.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
MERZ v. ASTORIA TAXICAB CORPORATION
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Summaries of
MERZ v. ASTORIA TAXICAB CORPORATION
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1918
182 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for
MERZ v. ASTORIA TAXICAB CORPORATION
Case Details
Full title:HANNAH MERZ, Appellant, v. ASTORIA TAXICAB CORPORATION and Another…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1918
Citations
182 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)