From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merwarth v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 10, 2023
Civil Action 21-4153 (E.D. Pa. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-4153

05-10-2023

TIMOTHY MICHAEL MERWARTH, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendants.


ORDER

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

AND NOW, this 10TH day of May 2023, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, and having reviewed the letter provided by Petition (ECF#31), it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes


Summaries of

Merwarth v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 10, 2023
Civil Action 21-4153 (E.D. Pa. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Merwarth v. McGinley

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY MICHAEL MERWARTH, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 21-4153 (E.D. Pa. May. 10, 2023)