From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mertsaris v. Paolo Sons Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted September 8, 1999

October 25, 1999

In an action to recover damages for the negligent construction of a residence, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.).


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In seeking to restore their action to the trial calendar after it was dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiffs were required to show the merits of the case, a reasonable excuse for the delay, the absence of an intent to abandon the matter, and the lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party if the case is restored to the calendar (see, McKenna v. Solomon, 255 A.D.2d 496; Tate v. Peninsula Hosp. Ctr., 255 A.D.2d 503 ; Jeffs v. Janessa, Inc., 226 A.D.2d 504 ). Because the plaintiffs failed to satisfy these requirements, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion (see, Fico v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater N.Y., 248 A.D.2d 432 ; Carter v. City of New York, 231 A.D.2d 485 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mertsaris v. Paolo Sons Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Mertsaris v. Paolo Sons Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HIPPOCRATIS MERTSARIS, et al., appellants, v. PAOLO SONS CONSTRUCTION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 639