Merriman v. State

Full title: Jeremy Lee Merriman, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

481 S.W.3d 56 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102569

11-24-2015

Jeremy Lee Merriman, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102–0899, Attorneys for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102–0899, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Merriman appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).