From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merriman v. Lowry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 20, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0771 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-0771 AC P

04-20-2020

DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN LOWRY, Defendant.


ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff's complaint in this case was filed on April 15, 2020, and challenges the conduct of psychologist and sole defendant M. Lowry on February 11, 2019. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is currently proceeding on the same claim and related claims against defendant Lowry and others in another action he earlier filed in this court. See Merriman v. Lowry et al., Case No. 19-1445 TLN KJN (see e.g., ECF No. 8 at 3). Due to the duplicative nature of the instant case, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed. ////

This court may take judicial notice of its own records and the records of other courts. See United States v. Howard, 381 F.3d 873, 876 n.1 (9th Cir. 2004); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980); see also Fed. R. Evid. 201 (court may take judicial notice of facts that are capable of accurate determination by sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned). --------

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within Twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 20, 2020

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Merriman v. Lowry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 20, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0771 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Merriman v. Lowry

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN LOWRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 20, 2020

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-0771 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2020)