From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jan 18, 2013
1:12CV351 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

1:12CV351 1:02CR236-1

01-18-2013

TYRONE LAMONT MERRILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On December 17, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections to the Recommendation have been filed. Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #66] is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence [Doc. #53] is GRANTED, that the Judgment [Doc. #13] is VACATED as to Count Two, and that Count Two of the Indictment [Doc. #1] is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be set for a hearing on the alleged violation of supervised release imposed as part of the conviction in Count One, which remains unaffected.

______________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Merrill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Jan 18, 2013
1:12CV351 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Merrill v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE LAMONT MERRILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

1:12CV351 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2013)