From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Buttrey

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 838 (1969)

Summary

threatening and discharging or refusing employment to employees because of union activity

Summary of this case from Ridgely Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

Opinion

No. 341.

October 13, 1969, OCTOBER TERM, 1969.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Alan W. Boyd and Thomas M. Scanlon for petitioner. Hugh A. Thornburg for respondent. Reported below: 410 F. 2d 135.


Summaries of

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Buttrey

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 838 (1969)

threatening and discharging or refusing employment to employees because of union activity

Summary of this case from Ridgely Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B
Case details for

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner v. Buttrey

Case Details

Full title:MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH, INC. v. BUTTREY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 13, 1969

Citations

396 U.S. 838 (1969)

Citing Cases

Starkman v. Seroussi

§ 6(d), 15 U.S.C. § 78f(d) (1970).Cf. Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc., 410 F.2d 135, 142…

Sacks v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.

The Seventh Circuit has formulated different standards. In Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith,…