From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2865-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2865-CMK-P.

November 1, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a), (a)(2). Specifically, while plaintiff has provided a certified copy of his trust account statement, he has not provided a complete in forma pauperis application. The application filed by plaintiff is missing the first page. Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff is warned that failure to resolve the fee status of this case within the time provided may result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.

DATED: October 29, 2010


Summaries of

Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 1, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2865-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS MERRIDA, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE PROVIDER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2865-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2010)