From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrick v. Merrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1992
181 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 12, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).


The intention of the parties that the provisions of the separation agreement be incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce is clear from the language of the agreement itself, and the same intention on the part of the Supreme Court is clear from its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, defendant's motion to resettle the judgment of divorce so as to reflect this intention was properly granted (Roll v Roll, 143 A.D.2d 651). The conclusory conjectural allegations set forth in the opposing affidavit of plaintiff's counsel were insufficient to rebut "the heavy presumption that a deliberately prepared and executed written instrument manifested the true intention of the parties" (Backer Mgt. Corp. v Acme Quilting Co., 46 N.Y.2d 211, 219).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Merrick v. Merrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1992
181 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Merrick v. Merrick

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MERRICK, Appellant, v. KAREN P. MERRICK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Sally v. Leong

We begin with an analysis of whether the provisions of the parties' settlement agreement concerning payment…

Sendelbach v. Caravaggi

The only source of possible doubt as to the parties' intent to incorporate the separation agreement into the…