Opinion
January, 1933.
Order as resettled denying defendant's motion to require plaintiff to increase security affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Mermaid Cinema Corp. v. General Talking Pictures
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1933
237 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Summaries of
Mermaid Cinema Corp. v. General Talking Pictures
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1933
237 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for
Mermaid Cinema Corp. v. General Talking Pictures
Case Details
Full title:MERMAID CINEMA CORPORATION, Respondent, v. GENERAL TALKING PICTURES…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1933
Citations
237 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)