From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merl v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 25, 1994
207 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.).


A motion to set aside a verdict as against the weight of the credible evidence invokes the court's discretion to see that justice is done. The Trial Judge has had an opportunity to view the witnesses and the entire conduct of the trial, and "resolution of such a motion involves an application of that professional judgment gleaned from the Judge's background and experience as a student, practitioner and Judge" (Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 135).

Here, the Trial Judge, following a painstaking review of the entire record, granted the motion. This determination must be accorded great respect (supra, at 137, citing, inter alia, Mann v. Hunt, 283 App. Div. 140), and based upon our own review of the record we conclude it was not an abuse of discretion. We reject as without merit defendant's claim that the Trial Justice impermissibly resolved credibility issues.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Merl v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 25, 1994
207 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Merl v. Adler

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIA MERL, Respondent, v. HERBERT ADLER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 25, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 323 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 185

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. Donuts

This action for personal injuries arises from the then six-year-old infant plaintiff having been severely…