From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merklin v. Lomax

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 14-13-00826-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00826-CV

11-14-2013

JAN R. MERKLIN, Appellant v. JOHN NOVA LOMAX AND HOUSTON PRESS, L.P., Appellees


Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 14, 2013.

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-19128


MEMORANDUM OPINION

According to information provided to this court, appellant filed a notice of interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order signed August 19, 2013, dismissing claims against two of the defendants named in the underlying suit. The clerk's record was due on or before September 30, 2013, but it has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b). On October 2, 2013, this court notified appellant that the clerk's record had not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). No response was filed.

In addition, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $195.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov't Code § 51.207 (same). On October 2, 2013, this court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and the appeal was subject to dismissal unless the fee was paid by October 14, 2013. No response was filed.

The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On October 17, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court's intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any other response to this court's notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Brown.


Summaries of

Merklin v. Lomax

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Nov 14, 2013
NO. 14-13-00826-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Merklin v. Lomax

Case Details

Full title:JAN R. MERKLIN, Appellant v. JOHN NOVA LOMAX AND HOUSTON PRESS, L.P.…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

NO. 14-13-00826-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 14, 2013)