From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merino v. Gomez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
2:21-cv-0572 DAD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0572 DAD KJN P

09-25-2023

FRANCISCO MERINO, Plaintiff, v. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEIMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Boone on October 5, 2023, at 1:00 p.m.

On September 18, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for appointment of an interpreter to assist him at the settlement conference. (ECF No. 176.) Plaintiff is informed that the court is not authorized to appoint an interpreter to assist plaintiff at the settlement conference. If plaintiff has difficulty understanding the settlement conference proceedings, he shall inform Judge Boone.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for appointment of an interpreter to assist him at the settlement conference (ECF No. 176) is denied.


Summaries of

Merino v. Gomez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
2:21-cv-0572 DAD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Merino v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO MERINO, Plaintiff, v. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0572 DAD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)