From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MERINO v. EL DORADO HILLS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2011
NO. CIV. S-10-2152 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-10-2152 LKK/DAD.

September 8, 2011


ORDER


1. Defendant's dismissal motion — as it relates to plaintiffs' procedural due process claim — presented matters outside the complaint. (Dkt. No. 27-2). Plaintiff has not objected to the court's consideration of those materials. The court believes that those materials should not be excluded, and indeed are appropriate for consideration, as they may be pertinent to the merits of the procedural due process claim. Accordingly, defendant's motion is hereby CONVERTED to a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(d).

2. Plaintiffs shall have until September 22, 2011 to present materials and briefing in opposition to defendant's converted summary judgment motion and to the materials submitted with it (namely, the Bair Declaration and its Exhibits). Defendant shall have until October 6, 2011 to present materials and briefing in Reply.

3. No party shall provide any further briefing or materials on any other claim in the complaint or any other matter raised in the original dismissal motion.

4. The hearing previously scheduled for September 12, 2011 is hereby RESCHEDULED to October 24, 2011, at 10:00 am. At that time the court will hear argument on the converted summary judgment motion, and on all other matters raised in the original dismissal motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MERINO v. EL DORADO HILLS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 8, 2011
NO. CIV. S-10-2152 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

MERINO v. EL DORADO HILLS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MERINO; STEVE MARANVILLE; KARA MERINO; BRENDA MARANVILLE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-10-2152 LKK/DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)