From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meres v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Mar 9, 1929
120 So. 766 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion filed March 9, 1929. Petition for rehearing denied April 22, 1929.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; O. L. Dayton, Judge.

McKay, Withers Ramsey, for Appellant;

Thomas Hamilton, for Appellee.


In a mortgage foreclosure the defense was payment and the bill of complaint was dismissed. Complainant appealed. Payment being an affirmative defense it should be shown by a clear preponderance of the evidence. 42 C. J. 117, Section 1677.

As to payment of the entire debt the evidence is indefinite, and the decree is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Meres v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Mar 9, 1929
120 So. 766 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Meres v. Clayton

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST MERES, as Receiver of the SPONGE EXCHANGE BANK OF TARPON SPRINGS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Mar 9, 1929

Citations

120 So. 766 (Fla. 1929)
120 So. 766

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. Morrison

His finding that the mortgage was paid off is supported only by Morrison's statement, "I paid the mortgage…

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Smith

We think the plaintiff below has clearly established the payment of the notes and mortgage by a preponderance…