From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercoglan v. Charlotte Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 22, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-209-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-209-FtM-38MRM

08-22-2018

ROBERT MERCOGLAN, Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Amended Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 36). Judge McCoy recommends granting Plaintiff Robert Mercoglan's Motion to Sever and for Partial Remand of Count I of the Amended Complaint. No party objects to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. (Doc. 37). The Report and Recommendation is thus ripe for review.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidenced or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge McCoy's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Amended Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.

(2) Plaintiff Robert Mercoglan's Motion to Sever and for Partial Remand of Count I of Amended Complaint (Doc. 33) is GRANTED.

a. Count I of the Amended Complaint, which alleges retaliation under Fla. Stat. § 440.205, is SEVERED and REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Charlotte County, Florida.

b. Mercoglan is DIRECTED to file a Second Amended Complaint that omits the retaliation claim on or before August 25, 2018.

c. Defendant Charlotte County Board of County Commissioners is DIRECTED to file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint on or before August 29, 2018.

(3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to transmit a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Charlotte County, Florida.
(4) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) is DENIED as moot.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 22nd day of August 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Mercoglan v. Charlotte Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 22, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-209-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Mercoglan v. Charlotte Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MERCOGLAN, Plaintiff, v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-209-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 22, 2018)