From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merchant v. Ryall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that it is disclosed by the record that defendants were not accorded a fair and impartial trial, and also upon the ground that, while it appears that the judgment gives to plaintiff greater relief than she is entitled to, the evidence is so unsatisfactory and uncertain, and the confused state of the record leaves it in doubt as to whether plaintiff has established her case by a fair preponderance of the evidence, the judgment cannot be permitted to stand. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Merchant v. Ryall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Merchant v. Ryall

Case Details

Full title:Metta F. Merchant, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. George M. Ryall…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

165 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)