Opinion
2:23-cv-00036-MMD-DJA
02-01-2023
EDWARD MERCHANT, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; and TRANS UNION LLC, Defendants.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Jory C. Garabedian, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10352 Attorneys for Defendant, Nissan Motor Acceptance
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
Jory C. Garabedian, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10352
Attorneys for Defendant, Nissan Motor Acceptance
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6 and Local Rule 6-1 of the U.S. District Court Rules, the undersigned, Jory C. Garabedian, Esq., of the law firm of WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP, as counsel of record for Defendant, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC (“NMAC”) and Michael Yancey III of the law firm of PRICE LAW GROUP, APC, as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Edward Merchant, hereby stipulate that NMAC shall file its response to the underlying Complaint by February 21, 2023 and states as follows:
1. No previous extensions have been requested.
2. Plaintiff filed his underlying Complaint in this action on January 6, 2023.
3. NMAC was served on January 10, 2023. It's deadline to respond is January 31, 2023.
4. NMAC requires additional time to adequately investigate and respond to the allegations in this Complaint. The parties are further exploring potential resolution.
5. The parties agreed that NMAC will have until February 21, 2023 to file its response.
6. The extension will not affect any other deadlines or prejudice any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.