From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercer v. Soong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 19-442-SDD-SDJ (M.D. La. Oct. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 19-442-SDD-SDJ

10-19-2020

MERCER v. SOONG, ET AL.


RULING

The Court, after carefully considering the Motion, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Scott D. Johnson, dated September 25, 2020, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Rec. Doc. 60.

Rec. Doc. 70.

ACCORDINGLY, the Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Soong, Miller, Kent, MacMurdo, Devall, Thurman, and Hickman are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the Plaintiff to serve the Defendants as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Rec. Doc. 60.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jacobs, Kim Doe, Wolf, Toloso, Pearce, Beckham, and Funderburk, are hereby dismissed sua sponte, without prejudice, for failure of the Plaintiff to serve the Defendants as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 19th day of October, 2020.

/s/ _________

CHIEF JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Mercer v. Soong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION 19-442-SDD-SDJ (M.D. La. Oct. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Mercer v. Soong

Case Details

Full title:MERCER v. SOONG, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 19-442-SDD-SDJ (M.D. La. Oct. 19, 2020)