From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercer v. Neal

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 17, 2021
No. 1D21-2598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1D21-2598

11-17-2021

Richard Mercer, Petitioner, v. Shannon Patricia Neal, Respondent.

Paul Bailey of Welton Law Firm, LLC, Crestview, and Brandon Brad Stewart of Stewart Law Firm, Crestview, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition-Original Jurisdiction.

Paul Bailey of Welton Law Firm, LLC, Crestview, and Brandon "Brad" Stewart of Stewart Law Firm, Crestview, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

ROWE, C.J., and ROBERTS and RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mercer v. Neal

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 17, 2021
No. 1D21-2598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Mercer v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:Richard Mercer, Petitioner, v. Shannon Patricia Neal, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

No. 1D21-2598 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)