From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merced Bank v. Morton

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 360 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment in the Superior Court of Merced County.

         The affidavit for attachment in this case is in the same form as that commented upon in Wilke v. Cohn, referred to in the opinion.

         COUNSEL

          J. K. Law, for Appellants.

          R. H. Ward and P. D. Wigginton, for Respondent.


         OPINION          The Court:

         On the authority of Wilke v. Cohn, 54 Cal. 212, the order of the Court below refusing to dissolve the attachment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to dissolve the attachment.


Summaries of

Merced Bank v. Morton

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1881
58 Cal. 360 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

Merced Bank v. Morton

Case Details

Full title:MERCED BANK v. JAMES MORTON et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1881

Citations

58 Cal. 360 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

Tapscott v. Lyon

The receiver is the agent of the court, and when acting within the scope of his order he receives property, a…

Simpson v. McCarty

The affidavit must be positive and not in the alternative. (Merced Bank v. Morton , 58 Cal. 360; Wilke v.…