From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercardo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98066.

2012-11-20

Donald MERCARDO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Bryan L. Hettenbach, Judge. Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Bryan L. Hettenbach, Judge.
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Donald Mercardo appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing from his guilty plea to seven counts of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).




Summaries of

Mercardo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Mercardo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Donald MERCARDO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

386 S.W.3d 212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)