From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercado v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 501868.

January 31, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Israel Mercado, Collins, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ.


A search of petitioner's prison cell recovered materials containing references to a particular gang. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing unauthorized organization material. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative review, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, confiscated materials and hearing testimony from a correction officer with specialized training in unauthorized organizations comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Jenkins v Goord, 30 AD3d 719, 720). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the restriction of his possession of materials related to the gang does not violate his 1st Amendment rights "inasmuch as it is reasonably related to the legitimate penological interest of maintaining prison security" ( Matter of Buford v Goord, 258 AD2d 761, 762; see Matter of Lucas v Scully, 71 NY2d 399, 405; Matter of Tenace v Goord, 278 AD2d 549, 550, lv denied 96 NY2d 707). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that facility personnel should have screened his mail and intercepted the materials before they were delivered to him, have been considered and are without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Mercado v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 31, 2008
47 A.D.3d 1167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Mercado v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ISRAEL MERCADO, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 1167 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 584
850 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

In re Hizbullah

We confirm. Initially, we note that petitioner is precluded from challenging the determination relative to…

Watson v. Fischer

Although that appears to have been the case, we reject petitioner's argument inasmuch as a copy of the rule,…