Opinion
20 Civ. 6533 (AT)
06-22-2022
JEFFREY MERCADO, TYRONE PRINGLE, ADAM ROMAN, KEVIN KNOIS, and EDWARD KALANZ, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, Defendants.
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE:
The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement hi this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case. ECF No. 117.
This action shall not be dismissed with prejudice unless the settlement agreement has been approved by the Court or the Department of Labor (“DOL”). See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015). Accordingly, to the extent the parties seek dismissal with prejudice, they must either file a joint letter motion requesting that the Court approve the settlement agreement or, alternatively, provide documentation of the approval by DOL. Any letter motion, along with the settlement agreement, must be filed on the public docket by September 19, 2022. The letter motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fan and reasonable and should discuss, at a minimum, the following factors:
(1) the plaintiff s range of possible recovery; (2) the extent to which “the settlement will enable the parties to avoid anticipated burdens and expenses hi establishing then-respective claims and defenses”; (3) the seriousness of the litigation risks faced by the parties; (4) whether “the settlement agreement is the product of arm's-length bargaining between experienced counsel”; and (5) the possibility of fraud or collusion.Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F.Supp.2d 332, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (quoting Medley v. Am. Cancer Soc'y, No. 10 Civ. 3214, 2010 WL 3000028, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2010)). The letter must also address whether there is a bona fide dispute as to the number of horn s worked or the amount of compensation due and how much of the proposed settlement plaintiff s attorney shall be seeking as fees. See Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 202, 207.
Any request for attorneys' fees must be accompanied by supporting documentation. “In this circuit, a proper fee request ‘entails submitting contemporaneous billing records documenting, for each attorney, the date, the horns expended, and the nature of the work done.'” Lopez v. Nights of Cabiria, LLC, 96 F.Supp.3d 170, 181 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (quoting Wolinsky, 900 F.Supp.2d at 336).
Absent special circumstances, the Court will not approve any settlement agreement that is filed under seal or in redacted form. See id. at 177 n. 44. In addition, absent compelling circumstances, the Court will not approve settlement agreements containing sweeping non-disclosure provisions, see id. at 179-80; Flood v. Carlson Rests. Inc., No. 14 Civ. 2740, 2015 WL 4111668, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 6, 2015), or broad releases waiving claims having no relation to FLSA issues, see Flood, 2015 WL 4111668, at *2.
The parties may consent to proceed before the Honorable Katharine H. Parker, who would then oversee the approval of the settlement. If the parties consent to Judge Parker's jurisdiction, they shall file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 on the docket. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Parker rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered.
Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated.
SO ORDERED.