From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MER, LLC v. Comerica Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02116-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02116-RPM

09-07-2012

MER, LLC., a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. COMERICA BANK, a Texas banking association, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

On August 17, 2012, the defendant Comerica Bank filed a [4] Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Today, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Amended Complaint, Response to Motion to Dismiss as Moot and Alternative Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time for Further Response [7]. The amended complaint has the original caption of a filing in the District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado but is accepted as a pleading filed in this court. The amended complaint does not cure the defects which have been raised by the defendant in its motion. Accordingly it is

ORDERED that the plaintiff shall have to and including October 22, 2012 within which to respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss.

BY THE COURT:

__________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

MER, LLC v. Comerica Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02116-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

MER, LLC v. Comerica Bank

Case Details

Full title:MER, LLC., a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. COMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02116-RPM (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)