From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menz v. Estate of Menz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 27, 1980
381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. PP-295.

March 27, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County.

Theodore R. Bowers, Panama City, for appellant.

William E. Harris, Panama City, for appellee.


The Order Determining Elective Share is hereby affirmed, except for its failure to award an attorney's fee to the widow. The personal representative had a duty to file a petition for and to pay the elective share in the case at bar. Rule 5.360, Rules of Probate and Guardianship (1979). The failure to do so necessitated the employment of counsel by the widow, and the attorney's efforts on the widow's behalf resulted in a change in the distribution of the will. See In Re Estate of Freedman, 340 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Menz v. Estate of Menz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 27, 1980
381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Menz v. Estate of Menz

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH E. MENZ, APPELLANT, v. IN RE THE ESTATE OF CLIFFORD M. MENZ…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 27, 1980

Citations

381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Tillman v. Smith

In response, Mrs. Smith, the surviving spouse, argues that, in addition to the tax savings conceded by the…

The Florida Bar

The committee offers no opinion on whether a personal representative may have a duty to oppose the…