From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menocal v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 14-72755 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-72755

08-03-2016

MARCOS ALIRIO MENOCAL, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A094-287-003 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Marcos Alirio Menocal, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary determination that Menocal failed to show the requisite exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Menocal v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
No. 14-72755 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Menocal v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:MARCOS ALIRIO MENOCAL, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 3, 2016

Citations

No. 14-72755 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2016)