From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meniooh v. Gagnon

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 3, 2022
21-cv-08495-VC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-08495-VC

11-03-2022

RA 'TAH B. MENIOOH, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS GAGNON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

The claims against the individual defendants are dismissed under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Dismissal is with prejudice, both because the plaintiff has consistently refused to serve the defendants in accordance with the Court's order and because, as already ruled, the claims are clearly barred by the statute of limitations in any event. Dkt. No. 39.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Meniooh v. Gagnon

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 3, 2022
21-cv-08495-VC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Meniooh v. Gagnon

Case Details

Full title:RA 'TAH B. MENIOOH, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS GAGNON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

21-cv-08495-VC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)