Meng v. Rahimi

1 Citing case

  1. Trillium Transp. Fuels v. Integral Energy, LLC

    No. CIV-20-1197-PRW (W.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2023)

    See Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. QBE Ins. Corp., 395 Fed. App'x 659, 663 (11th Cir. 2010) (discussing the doctrine of prevention of performance under Florida law); Allen v. State ex rel. Bd. of Trustees of Okla. Unif. Ret. Sys. for Justs. & Judges, 769 P.2d 1302, 1307-08 & n.28 (Okla. 1988) (discussing prevention of performance under Oklahoma law and collecting cases); Verbal v. TIVA Healthcare, Inc., 628 F.Supp.3d 1222, 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2022) (noting that frustration of purpose and impracticability are well-recognized excuses for non-performance of a contract under Florida law); Meng v. Rahimi, 505 P.3d 926, 928-29 (Okla. 2022) (discussing impossibility doctrine in Oklahoma law). Summary Judgment