From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 27, 2008
Nos. 05-07-00544-CR, 05-07-00545-CR (Tex. App. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 05-07-00544-CR, 05-07-00545-CR

Opinion issued May 27, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-32843-VP, F06-86254-SP.

Before Justices WRIGHT, BRIDGES, and MAZZANT.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Carlos Mario Mendoza waived a jury and pleaded guilty to two aggravated assault with a deadly weapon offenses. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at twenty-five years' imprisonment in each case. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 27, 2008
Nos. 05-07-00544-CR, 05-07-00545-CR (Tex. App. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Mendoza v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MARIO MENDOZA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

Nos. 05-07-00544-CR, 05-07-00545-CR (Tex. App. May. 27, 2008)