From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Aug 24, 2018
252 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17-2761

08-24-2018

Brianna C. MENDOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BLACK, Judge.Brianna Mendoza seeks correction of the order finding her in violation of her probation. She does not challenge the finding that she violated probation or the resulting sentence, and we affirm both without comment. But because the revocation order should reflect the oral pronouncement, we remand for the trial court to strike the revocation order and enter a corrected revocation order reflecting two condition 5 violations and conforming to the oral pronouncement in all other respects. See Reed v. State, 127 So.3d 817, 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J. and SALARIO, J., concur.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Aug 24, 2018
252 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Mendoza v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIANNA C. MENDOZA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 24, 2018

Citations

252 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)