From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 25, 2015
No. 06-14-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2015)

Opinion

No. 06-14-00226-CR

06-25-2015

ELIZABETH MENDOZA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court No. F13-34344-X
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After Elizabeth Mendoza pled guilty to the offense of attempted possession of a controlled substance, she was placed on ten months' deferred adjudication community supervision in accord with the terms of a plea agreement with the State. Thereafter, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt. Mendoza entered an open plea of "true" to the allegations in the State's motion, her community supervision was revoked, and she was sentenced to one year's confinement in the county jail. The judgment adjudicating guilt, however, incorrectly indicates that Mendoza's one-year sentence was the result of a plea bargain. Mendoza asks that the judgment be modified to accurately reflect that she was sentenced pursuant to her open plea of true. The State agrees that the judgment adjudicating guilt should be modified to correctly reflect that Mendoza entered her plea of true without the benefit of a plea agreement.

Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to Section 73.001 of the Texas Government Code. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Fifth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. --------

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure give this Court authority to modify judgments to correct errors and make the record speak the truth. TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); French v. State, 830 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Rhoten v. State, 299 S.W.3d 349, 356 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.). Therefore, we hereby modify the judgment to indicate that Mendoza's one-year sentence reflected in the judgment adjudicating guilt for the offense of attempted possession of a controlled substance was not imposed pursuant to a plea agreement.

As modified, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice
Date Submitted: June 11, 2015
Date Decided: June 25, 2015
Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Mendoza v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Jun 25, 2015
No. 06-14-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Mendoza v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MENDOZA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Jun 25, 2015

Citations

No. 06-14-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2015)