From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Romero

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Mar 8, 2007
CIV 05-1303 BB/CEG (D.N.M. Mar. 8, 2007)

Opinion

CIV 05-1303 BB/CEG.

March 8, 2007


AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION


This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Carlos Tovar Mendoza's Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. See Doc. 37. The Court has considered Petitioner's objections and, in light of the record and the relevant law, concludes that Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is well taken and should be granted. Timely objections to the foregoing may be made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED THAT an evidentiary hearing is warranted.

THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF SERVICE of a copy of these Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition they may file written objections with the Clerk of the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party must file any objections with the Clerk of the District Court within the ten day period if that party wants to have appellate review of the proposed findings and recommended disposition. If no objections are filed, no appellate review will be allowed.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Romero

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Mar 8, 2007
CIV 05-1303 BB/CEG (D.N.M. Mar. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Romero

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS TOVAR MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY ROMERO, Director, Regional…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

CIV 05-1303 BB/CEG (D.N.M. Mar. 8, 2007)